Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 19, 2010, 05:46:20 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Interested in joining the WebsiteBaker team?
For more Information read here or on our new website.
110411 Posts in 15942 Topics by 9294 Members
Latest Member: papirex
* Home Help Search Login Register
+  WebsiteBaker Community Forum
|-+  English
| |-+  Templates, Menus & Design (Moderators: Argos, BerndJM)
| | |-+  Buggy templates listed on the Add-ons repository
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Buggy templates listed on the Add-ons repository  (Read 916 times)
doc

Offline Offline

Posts: 3579


« on: October 02, 2009, 07:19:44 AM »

Hi,

thought it might be a good idea to start a list with buggy templates listed on the Add-ons repository. The list should help to find templates with problems such as outdated Anynews calls or usage of code snippets without checking if the snippet is installed resulting in a fatal error meassage or a white page.

Buggy template:
Template: Andreas01
Version: 3.00
Desc: Uses the outdated function call display_news_items instead of displayNewsItems

Feel free to report further buggy templates in this thread.

Regards Doc
« Last Edit: February 27, 2010, 09:28:56 AM by doc » Logged
kweitzel
Forum administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5559


WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2009, 09:03:13 AM »

Hi Doc,

thanks for taking the time to look through them!

@all: We are looking for somebody to maintain the add-on repository. Please get in touch via the contact forms on our homepage: http://start.websitebaker2.org/

cheers

Klaus
Logged

http://www.weitzel.biz
PM has been disabled
Argos
Forum administrator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1341


WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2010, 03:43:21 PM »

Maybe it's a better idea do it the other way around, to place all WB2.8 checked templates in a separate section. And tell on the templates repository that templates may be outdated and/or have errors if not in the WB2.8 section.

There are also lots of very ugly amateuristic templates available, that don't have anysthing special in design or function. Of course it's very subjective and you can't argue over tase, but maybe the baddest ones could just be deleted. They can give WB a bad image.
« Last Edit: January 18, 2010, 03:46:26 PM by Argos » Logged

Jurgen Nijhuis
Argos Media
www.argosmedia.nl/portfolio (mostly WB sites)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please don't request personal support, use the forums!
erpe

Offline Offline

Posts: 1737



WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2010, 04:04:46 PM »

As I have learned:

these things are always a matter of taste.

Maybe we start the counter again and then throw the less or none downloaded out?

rgds

erpe
Logged

doc

Offline Offline

Posts: 3579


« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2010, 05:54:28 PM »

Hi,

Quote from: Argos
Maybe it's a better idea do it the other way around, to place all WB2.8 checked templates in a separate section. And tell on the templates repository that templates may be outdated and/or have errors if not in the WB2.8 section.
The most up to date overview of "nice" Website Baker templates can be found at Chios site. Chio invested a lot of time to "convert" some of the "better" templates to a certain standard (e.g. remove warnings, fix some CSS issues etc.).

Bet most of the templates available on the Add-ons repository which were derived from other Open Source templates (like all Andreas templates) are "outdated". Checked a view of the "better" templates listed on the Add-ons repository and in about 85% of the cases, fixed or updated templates were available at the site of the original template author (e.g. adaptions for IE 7, 8 family etc.).

Regards Doc
« Last Edit: January 18, 2010, 05:56:13 PM by doc » Logged
Waldschwein
Forum Team
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1282



WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2010, 06:18:29 PM »

Hello!

I think judging templates or add-ons by downloads is not that good.
The "best" idea is: Remove all templates (doesn't matter if people see it or just "behind the curtain") and then setting up a list. Like "XHTML / CSS Valid", "Displays in: IE7, IE8, Firefox, Opera, WebKit...", "Looks good positioned", "..."
And then count up from 0. If - let's say - at least 5 from 10 points appear "green", then all this templates are on a "to-do list" where the not reached points are either fixed or just mentioned.  

Yes, Chios site is good, quite as it's for modules AMASP. But - both are no official sites, and we either have to display here on wb2.org good add-ons (modules, templates...) or just none. It would be no shame if there are no add-ons on wb2.org at all. wink Better none than no good ones, then a link to an external site would be much better.

Yours Michael
« Last Edit: January 18, 2010, 06:20:14 PM by Waldschwein » Logged

Help! What's a survey? Read my blog -> www.zweiwelt.com | " Make no small plans for they have not the power to stir men`s blood." - Niccolo Machiavelli


Get here the new WebsiteBaker logo! It's the only one.
doc

Offline Offline

Posts: 3579


« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2010, 06:26:55 PM »

Hi,

Quote from: Waldschwein
...setting up a list. Like "XHTML / CSS Valid", "Displays in: IE7, IE8, Firefox, Opera, WebKit...", "Looks good positioned", "..."
That was how Chio has done the downselection of available templates as he started his Template showcase. He put an Excel file together with lots of information about available templates, pros- and cons, quality and much more. Maybe this "old" list is a good starting point.

Doc
Logged
doc

Offline Offline

Posts: 3579


« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2010, 09:08:45 AM »

Hi,

an issue with the template Multiflex-1 was reported in this thread.

Buggy template:
Template: Multiflex-1
Version: 1.0
Desc: Uses the outdated function call display_news_items instead of displayNewsItems

Feel free to report further buggy templates in this thread.

Doc
« Last Edit: February 27, 2010, 09:29:10 AM by doc » Logged
doc

Offline Offline

Posts: 3579


« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2010, 09:40:53 AM »

Hi,

not a bug but a comment on template Zenlike.

Zenlike uses it´s own PHP code to retrieve News from the WB news DB table. This code could be replaced with the Anynews in a future version.

Doc

Logged
jorma

Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2010, 12:57:12 PM »

Hi folks!

I was trying to download template "dreamy", but size of zip is only 19,9 kt??? Is there some problem with this template?

Best Regards, Jorma
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!