albatros
 Offline
Posts: 673
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: April 28, 2009, 11:55:58 PM » |
|
Hi sky writer, I tried the quoted code here http://www.willingen-ferienhaus.de/pages/testseite.php and it works in FF, Opera, IE8 and IE7. It's the same code, only another video (one of my favorites  ). I will let it stay here temporarily. The changes I made, you can read in a former posting http://www.websitebaker2.org/forum/index.php/topic,11327.msg68099.html#msg68099 of the same thread. hth albatros Edit: the video doesn't work in IE6 (don't know why in this moment), but the images do. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 29, 2009, 12:22:01 AM by albatros »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sky writer
Offline
Posts: 252
|
|
« Reply #26 on: April 29, 2009, 12:40:38 AM » |
|
Hi albatros,
Your video page works for me.
But I tried the changes that you stated in the thread and I still get the video (or images) opening way down at the bottom of the page. I notice in that same thread that you had this same issue. Do you remember what was causing this for you?
This is driving me a little mad.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
albatros
Offline
Posts: 673
|
|
« Reply #27 on: April 29, 2009, 01:10:49 AM » |
|
Hi, sorry! I really forgot that. At the End of line 145 in jquery.fancybox.js I changed from "- 40;" to "/ 3;" so it's now var itemTop = viewportPos[3] + Math.round((viewportPos[1] - itemSize[1]) / 2) / 3; After that, it also worked in Opera. hth albatros |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 29, 2009, 01:14:45 AM by albatros »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
noname8
Offline
Posts: 71
|
|
« Reply #28 on: July 07, 2009, 05:01:26 PM » |
|
Downloaded this fancy box and it's working nicely.
Minor bad thing is that with Opera it opens the image to under the screen if page is longer than screen.
(Seem's like it's always 30% of body height or similiar, so if body is 3000px long, picture goes too down..)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
albatros
Offline
Posts: 673
|
|
« Reply #29 on: July 11, 2009, 12:42:36 PM » |
|
Hi,
did you try my suggestion of the posting before?
Best regards
Uwe
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Olli
Offline
Posts: 288
|
|
« Reply #30 on: August 20, 2009, 10:00:14 PM » |
|
hey there,
is there an approach to get the fancy box snippet not to insert all css / javascript below the <body> tag since this seems not to be valid code anymore?
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olli
Offline
Posts: 288
|
|
« Reply #32 on: August 26, 2009, 04:15:28 AM » |
|
hi albatros, sorry i did not read all topics completly. thanks for pointing me to your solution  all the best |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
reddi
Offline
Posts: 2
|
|
« Reply #33 on: September 01, 2009, 07:11:56 PM » |
|
i changed the include.php of fancy_box_0.3b. the include is now valid to w3c. have fun. i named it to fancy_box_0.3c.
greets from germany
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
erpe
Offline
Posts: 2077
|
|
« Reply #34 on: October 12, 2009, 09:38:48 AM » |
|
Hi I reworked the fancy_box to fit the needs of 2.8. Box now uses the jquery from include_directory and I did some changes on the css file. This release now needs wb 2.8 as a minimum requirement. A small tutorial is posted here: http://www.websitebaker2.org/forum/index.php/topic,11327.msg67934.html#msg67934The new release and the last for 2.7 can be downloaded on AMASP. Instead of a code page (for the box php call) you can use a droplet: ob_start();
use_fancy_box();
$fancy_content = ob_get_contents();
ob_end_clean();
return $fancy_content; and call it with [[fancybox]] It will not be available on the official library because it is a function call that needs the snippet fancybox. rgds erpe |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 15, 2009, 01:27:31 PM by erpe »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Argos
|
|
« Reply #35 on: October 12, 2009, 11:19:40 AM » |
|
Nice one, erpe!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Luisehahne
|
|
« Reply #36 on: October 12, 2009, 03:04:38 PM » |
|
Hi,
in the nigthly build Changeset 1164 is a new Version of Fancybox, updated from 1.0 to 1.2.1
Dietmar
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are human beings - and nobody is perfect at all.
|
|
|
erpe
Offline
Posts: 2077
|
|
« Reply #37 on: October 12, 2009, 03:18:55 PM » |
|
On the first look the fancybox doesn't seem to work with the same style as the existing one. And classes must be modified........... ..... http://www.rvb.bplaced.net/pages/fancy.phpI like the fancybox style as it was. Why was this updated? Is it possible to let the old one stay too? rgds erpe |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Luisehahne
|
|
« Reply #38 on: October 12, 2009, 03:26:28 PM » |
|
Then take the old one in the fancy module folder
Dietmar
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are human beings - and nobody is perfect at all.
|
|
|
|
Luisehahne
|
|
« Reply #39 on: October 12, 2009, 03:30:48 PM » |
|
Hi Erpe, what do you have for problems, looks good on your side here is the expample side from the author http://fancybox.net/exampleDietmar |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are human beings - and nobody is perfect at all.
|
|
|
erpe
Offline
Posts: 2077
|
|
« Reply #40 on: October 12, 2009, 03:37:38 PM » |
|
Then take the old one in the fancy module folder That was why I reworked the module. Don't want to have the same file twice on different places. Who decides if a file will be updated or not? Why is this new js-file needed? erpe |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dbs
WebsiteBaker Org e.V.
Offline
Posts: 3262
|
|
« Reply #41 on: October 12, 2009, 03:43:08 PM » |
|
@erpe: on your page only works youtube-link, but it dont play...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Luisehahne
|
|
« Reply #42 on: October 12, 2009, 03:43:19 PM » |
|
It's normaly that old files will be going updated to the newst one, if there are extended and added options. If you have problems zip the fancybox folder, send it here and i will be going to help you.
Dietmar
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are human beings - and nobody is perfect at all.
|
|
|
|
Luisehahne
|
|
« Reply #43 on: October 12, 2009, 03:47:17 PM » |
|
@dbs on your page only works youtube-link, but it dont play... i think there is a wrong usage and implatations Dietmar |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are human beings - and nobody is perfect at all.
|
|
|
dbs
WebsiteBaker Org e.V.
Offline
Posts: 3262
|
|
« Reply #44 on: October 12, 2009, 03:57:11 PM » |
|
@dietmar: wtf is a nighly build and where is it to find? u make nightshifts for wb? dbs |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Luisehahne
|
|
« Reply #45 on: October 12, 2009, 04:00:31 PM » |
|
This are the changes for the new fancybox
* Changed grouping, from now groups will be created using "rel" tag (as in first version)
* Content now is also iframed when anchor has class "iframe"
* New callback "callbackOnShow" - fired after content is shown
* New option "padding" - sets nice padding around content
* Added fix as reported on this post
* Fixed bug - added missing unbind actions
* + Some minor CSS and code changes
I think i will be going to develop a new fancaboxmodul, to use all possibilities that are in WB
Dietmar
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are human beings - and nobody is perfect at all.
|
|
|
erpe
Offline
Posts: 2077
|
|
« Reply #46 on: October 12, 2009, 04:45:49 PM » |
|
@erpe: on your page only works youtube-link, but it dont play... I simply replaced the fancybox js with the new one. That is not the way updates can be made, Dietmar (from my point of view). We should talk about this......... rgds erpe |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Luisehahne
|
|
« Reply #47 on: October 12, 2009, 06:18:47 PM » |
|
If the snippet and modules are developed well, then there are no problems. For me it is not theme to discuss it.
I want the best for websitebaker. There were bugfixes and so i replace it.
I started a new fancybox snippet, think tomorrow it will be finish. I look in the old functionname to set it equal, so that nobody has problems. But now the snippet will work with frontend.css for your own styles and frontend.js. If to set the JS before bodyend, then rename frontend.js to frontend_body.js
If there are problems i will be going to help. I know, for most people there are missunderstandings to work with jquery framework.
Dietmar
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are human beings - and nobody is perfect at all.
|
|
|
erpe
Offline
Posts: 2077
|
|
« Reply #48 on: October 12, 2009, 06:27:53 PM » |
|
But remember:
2.8. is the current version............ ..
rgds
erpe
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Luisehahne
|
|
« Reply #49 on: October 12, 2009, 06:54:53 PM » |
|
Oh yes i know, i only develope under 2.8 and will be tested too under 2.7
Dietmar
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
We are human beings - and nobody is perfect at all.
|
|
|
|
WebsiteBaker Community Forum
